|
|

News from the Editor
Dear readers,
Welcome to a new instalment of our society’s
newsletter! Remember how I asked you to
weigh in on the use of the picture representing
the “spirit” of behavioral medicine? Well,
so far nobody weighed in on whether this is a
good or a bad example. I didn’t get any suggestions
for alternatives, either. So I guess I
will stick with this one until somebody comes
up with a better idea. The polls are not closed
on this matter, yet!
This time around, we have a fascinating account
of Brian Oldenburg’s professional life,
featured in our interview section. Go to page
6 to learn how the Olympics in Beijing are associated
with behavioral medicine, you will be
surprised to learn the answer!
Unfortunately, I couldn’t find a member society
willing to write a brief presentation of the
society for this edition. I sincerely hope that
there will be plenty of queries for the next issue
which is supposedly coming out in August.
So, if you want to present your society to the
readers of this newsletter (potentially no lessthan 8000 individuals!), then please send me a
note (u.nater@psychologie.uzh.ch).
In the current issue, I want to specifically
point out the feature on our next two
awardees in the awardee series, the update
on the upcoming ICBM in Washington (it’s going
to be one of the biggest behavioral medicine
gatherings, ever!), as well as reports from
the President, Early Career Network, and the
Editor of our society’s journal.
I am very much looking forward to seeing you
all in Washington!
Best wishes to all of you,
Urs Nater
Newsletter Editor
Publisher: ISBM - International Society of Behavioral
Medicine
Editor: Urs Nater
Contributing Authors:Hege R. Erikson, Joost Dekker,
Brian Oldenburg, Marisa Finn, Carina Chan, Linda
Baumann, Wong Li Ping, Roger Persson.
Layout: Andreas Wenger
Postal address:
ISBM - communication chair
Helmholzstrasse 22
89081 Ulm
Copyright by ISBM
|
| |
| |
| |
Letter from the President
|
| |
Dear all member societies and all individual
members of our member societies,
Norwegians are particularly interested in the
winter Olympics. All the athletes, competing
in all kind of different weird winter activities,
of interest for a minority of the world population,
do indeed engage us. Actually, most of
us Norwegians do not really understand that
the rest of the world believes we are strange.
According to Wall Street Journal, by the end
of these Olympic Games, the Norwegians will
have pulled off what is, arguably, one of the
finest performances in the modern history of
sports. The only problem is that nobody outside
Norway seems to take us seriously. Norway
has won more Winter Games medals
than any other nation. Nevertheless, most
people are unaware of Norway's Winter
Games dominance. Those who are can be
quick to dismiss it with stereotypes. The Norwegians
are born on skis, they'll say, because
the whole country is one giant snowpack. It
doesn't help that Norwegians don't like to
toot their own horns. Instead, the thousands
who traveled across the world to Vancouver
stand along ski trails banging cowbells so
loudly that nobody can hear the announcer
declaring yet another medal-finish for Norway.
So what does this have to do with behavior
medicine? There are several things; one is
that the majority of Norwegians sits passively
in their chairs or sofas and is physically inactive. Sports events tend to make more people
passive than active, which is not good for our
health. The other point is that what seems important to us, may be totally irrelevant to
the rest of the world. This may indeed be the
case for many of us. I believe behavioral
medicine is one of the most important fields
in the world, but the world may disagree with
me. I have a good friend who believes he is
kind of famous. In a discussion between my
son and my friend, they did agree that he was
famous. My son was impressed, sat quiet for a
while and said; what a shame that so few
people know about it! This is a challenge for
ISBM and our member societies. There is a lot
of really good and interesting activities going
on in our member societies that many of us
could and should learn from. Our Newsletter
editor has done an important job trying to get
more information about what is going on in
the member societies out to the other societies.
The work for the ICBM in Washington D.C. is
in very good progress. I have to admit that I
was very nervous when we had only about
100 submitted abstracts by the original abstract
deadline. However, a number of people
put down a substantial amount of work, and
by the extended abstract deadline we had
more than 660 submitted abstracts. We expect
even more abstracts submitted for rapid
poster communication, and hope as many as
possible of the members of our member societies
will be there. Tell someone about it
and bring a friend to the ICBM 2010! Maybe
our congress is a bit like the Winter Olympics, fairly few participants from a few selected
countries, but with very enthusiastic supporters
that sometimes makes too much noise so
we cannot hear what is really going on.
Involving our member societies has been a
main aim for me as president of ISBM. The
Program Committee for the ICBM 2010 in
Washington D.C., with Linda Baumann as
chair, has worked really hard this winter.
Linda Baumann and the rest of the Program
Committee have done an excellent job in engaging
and involving our member societies in
the planning of the ICBM 2010. I do not believe
we have had representatives and nominations
from so many of our member societies
ever before. I am indeed grateful that
Linda has worked so hard to achieve this, and
for the positive responses from our member
societies.
Last year we worked hard together with the
Italian Society of psychosocial medicine to get
the proposal for Rome in the best shape possible.
Even after intense efforts by the president
of that society, Lucio Sibilia, the Italian
Society had to withdraw their proposal, and
we had to start all over again. A call for proposals
and direct contact with some of the
member societies resulted in two very good
proposals for ICBM 2012. One was from the
Netherlands Behavioral Medicine Federation
with Groningen as the suggested site, and the
other was from the Hungarian Society of Behavioural
Sciences and Medicine, with Budapest
as the suggested site. After careful review
from the Board and the Governing Council,
the Governing Council voted in favor of
Budapest. I am indeed very pleased that we
now have a very good host for the ICBM 2012.
Last year, the secretary of ISBM, Peter Kaufmann,
resigned from his position, and Urs
Nater our Newsletter editor has stepped in as
secretary for ISBM. I am very pleased with this solution, and Urs has performed his duties as
secretary in a very good way. You will hear
more from Urs later, and do not hesitate to
contact him if you have any questions regarding
ISBM.
There is quite a lot of activities going on in
ISBM, you will be able to read more about
some of it in the Newsletter.
Despite all the good activities in ISBM, we still
have a number of challenges in how to improve
communication in the organization.
Hopefully we will be able to move that a bit
further the next 5-6 months before the next
Board and Governing Council meeting. A main
goal, as I see it, is to encourage even more
participation from our member societies, and,
in particular, to strive to accomplish a generation
shift in our governing councils and
elected officers. I hope many young ISBM enthusiasts
are eager to step up and in to important
positions in ISBM, and will encourage all
member societies to nominate good and enthusiastic
candidates for the different positions.
|
|
|
Hege R. Eriksen
President ISBM
|
News from the Editor-in Chief of IJBM
February 2010
Special series
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
has published a special series on Psychological
Aspects of Cardiovascular Disease in issue
16,3. The special series consists of 8 papers,
plus an editorial by Katri Raikkönen. Papers
focus on positive and adaptive traits, on negative
affect, on socioeconomic status, on behavioral
interventions and on social support.
IJBM intends to publish other special issues or
special series. Please feel free to contact me if
you are interested in a particular topic. I am
willing to discuss various options and alternatives
with regard to special issues or series.
Email: j.dekker@vumc.nl.
TOC alert
Many interesting papers have been published
in recent issues of IJBM. I would like to invite
you to check the Table of Contents of IJBM.
Just to remind you: the free Table of Contents
Alert is available at the ISBM website: do register!
In addition, do remember that access to
the online version of IJBM is free for all members
of national societies. If you do not remember
the username and password: contact
the representative of your national society or
me (j.dekker@vumc.nl).
The Editor’s choice
Kathryn Robb, Alice Simon and Jane Wardle
published a paper on Socioeconomic Disparities
in Optimism and Pessimism, (IJBM 2009,
16: 331-338; DOI 10.1007/s12529-008-9018-
0). Background Socioeconomic status (SES)
exhibits a graded relationship with health. Explanations
for the SES gradient in health have
drawn on environmental, cultural, psychosocial,
and behavioural factors, with growing
recognition that a complex interplay of causal
processes underlies the relationship. While
optimism has been strongly linked with
health, there have been surprisingly few reports
examining SES differences in optimism.
The purpose of the study was to assess the relationship
between SES and trait optimism
and pessimism in a representative community
sample of older British adults. Community
samples of adults were mailed self-report
questionnaires. Optimism was measured by
the Life Orientation Test (LOT), which generates
a total score and positive (optimism) and
negative (pessimism) subscale scores. SES was
assessed with an individual-level index of socioeconomic
deprivation based on education,
housing tenure, and car ownership.
There was a strong SES gradient in the total
LOT score, with higher SES being associated
with higher scores. However, when pessimism
and optimism subscales were analyzed separately,
the gradient was strong for pessimism,
but minimal for optimism.
The authors concluded that lower SES is associated
with viewing the future as containing
more negative events, but there was little SES
difference for positive events. The results suggest
that lower SES people view the future in
a strikingly more negative light but are almost
as likely as higher SES groups to expect goodevents in the future. This may imply that engaging
lower SES groups in preventive behaviors
requires tackling their lower expectations
of success.
IJBM Submission and review characteristics
2009
The number of manuscripts submitted to IJBM
in 2009 amounted to 131. The number of
manuscripts with a final decision was 80. The
acceptance rate was 24%. Manuscripts originated
from the following regions: Africa: 2%;
Asia: 23%; Australia/NZ: 8%; Europe: 38%;
Middle and South America: 1%; and North
America: 29%.
The table gives an overview over the submission
and review characteristics over the years.
The table shows that the number of manuscripts
submitted to IJBM increased steadily
over the years. The acceptance rate decreased
in 2008 and seems to stabilize in
2009.
Search for members of the Editorial Board
IJBM hast started the search for new members
of the Editorial Board, who are willing to
review manuscripts submitted to IJBM. If you
are interested, please contact me directly at
j.dekker@vumc.nl. The scope of IJBM extends
from research on biobehavioral mechanisms
and clinical studies on diagnosis, treatment
and rehabilitation to research on public
health, including health promotion and prevention.
IJBM publishes research originating
from all continents, and is inviting research on
multi-national, multi-cultural and global aspects
of health and illness.
Joost Dekker
Editor IJBM
Joost Dekker
Editor IJBM

|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Interview with Brian Oldenburg
Q1.
Brian, first of all, thank you so much for
agreeing to be the third interviewee in this series.
This special series covers individuals who
are long-term members of ISBM and have
contributed to behavioral medicine in a significant
manner. Could you briefly outline
your involvement in behavioral medicine as a
professional field and your current scientific
interests?
A1.
It’s interesting now that I look back over
my professional working life, I realize that I’ve
actually been involved in the field of behavioral
medicine for much longer than I was
even aware of at the time. I would say that I
started undertaking behavioral medicine research
in the late 1970’s, however, I didn’t call
it that and nor did I attend my first ‘real’ behavioral
medicine conference until 1987,
when I made a poster presentation at the 8th
Annual Meeting of US Society of Behavioral
Medicine in Washington D.C, USA. With that
poster, I was presenting some of my earlier
doctoral research findings concerning the psychosocial
aspects of end-stage renal disease
and I had used Spielberger’s State-Trait Anxiety
Inventory for one of my measures. A very
well spoken man came up to my poster and
started to interrogate me on my study and
how I had actually used these scales; however,
he did not introdue himself to me at that
stage. After talking to me for more than 15
minutes – and for what seemed like an eternity
- he finally said to me, ‘‘I’m Charlie Spielberger’’
and I was then very embarrassed because
I hadn’t known who I had been talking
to for all that time! That experience had a big
impact on me and made me realise that no
matter how important you are in this world,
it’s always very important to talk to and interact
with students and early career researchers
about their research and their career development.
My current scientific interests mainly focus on
investigating new and novel ways to prevent
and manage chronic non-communicable diseases
and their risk factors and determinants.
However, I would say that over the years, my
research on how to improve health and wellbeing
has gradually moved more and more
‘upstream’ and more of my research now focuses
on the health of ‘populations’ rather
than individuals. I’ve also become increasingly
interested in policy, social and environmental
interventions as a way of influencing people’s
health, particularly in disadvantaged and vulnerable
populations. I am also doing a lot of
research in developing countries and regions
in the world, particularly in China and Southern
Africa, so I spend almost half of each year
travelling and working in other countries now.
For example, I’m currently involved in research
related to chronic disease prevention
and management trials in Malaysia, China, India
and South Africa.
Q2. Could you please tell us about your educational
and scientific background? Where do
you come from scientifically and how did you
get into the emerging field of behavioral
medicine?
A2.
I first graduated in psychology in 1975
from University of NSW (UNSW) in Sydney,Australia. The UNSW School of Psychology
was still a very new school when I
commenced there in 1972 and it had just established
one of the very first behavior therapy
training programs outside the USA. That
was a very exciting time to do psychology because
there was so much new research being
undertaken and there was also a superb
community psychology program that had recently
been established, by one of my earliest
mentors, Robin Winkler.
|
At the same time as
studying psychology, I also did another major
in sociology, so I graduated with a double major
in both sociology and psychology. Soon after
that, I then undertook a Masters of Clinical
Psychology also at UNSW, because at that
time, I thought I
would really like to
be a clinical psychologist
working in
mental health services
and I wanted to
start applying all of
these very exciting
new behavior therapy
techniques to
help people. However,
after working
overseas for a
couple of years and
coming back to Australia,
I actually found myself working at one
of the best university teaching hospitals in
Sydney, The Prince Henry & Prince of Wales
Hospitals, that had just established a new Department
of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry to
provide mental health services to the general
wards of the hospital. |
For the first time in my
professional working life, I found myself working
mainly in the medical and surgical wards
of a hospital. Because many excellent clinical
and other research units were co-located at
this hospital, this also brought me into contact
with some of the best Australian researchers
in the fields of high blood pressure, renal disease
and heart disease. I became so interested
in clinical medical research that I decided
that I really wanted to undertake more formal
training in medical research and epidemiology.
So, my next step was to commence a Ph.D.
research program and I was jointly supervised
by a Professor of Psychiatry (Gavin Andrews)
and a Professor of Renal Medicine (Graham
Macdonald), both of whom became terrific
and lifelong mentors for me.
As I said at the
beginning of this
interview, I realise
now that I
look back on the
research I was
undertaking in
the early 1980’s,
I was actually
doing behavioral
medicine research,
but there
were not very
many psychologists
doing this
kind of research in Australia at that time, so I
didn’t actually know what to call the field that
I was researching! My doctoral research examined
the complex interplay among behavioral,
psychosocial and biological influences
on fluid non-compliance in people who were
undergoing renal dialysis. I also begun to start
publishing in journals at this time and I conducted
my very first ‘real’ clinical trial. As timewent on, I became more and more interested
in epidemiology (and the related public health
sciences) and I realised that a background and
training in the social and behavioral sciences
was really perfect for understanding epidemiology
and biostatistics. Following the completion
of my Ph.D. in 1987, I spent some time
overseas and met many of the “rising stars” in
US behavioral medicine and public health at
that time. As I think back to that time in US,
probably the four people who had the most
long term impact on me were Jim Sallis at San
Diego State University, Bob Kaplan who was at
University of California (San Diego) at that
time, Tom Coates at University of California
(San Francisco) and Steve Weiss who was still
at US NIH National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
(NHLBI) at that time.
By the time I returned to Australia, I really
knew that I wanted a career in public health
and behavioral medicine research, but I really
didn’t know where I was going to be able to
do this! However, due to a fortuitous set of
circumstances, I got my first full time research
and academic position in the School of Public
Health at the University of Sydney in 1988.
Since that time, I have continued to work in
Schools of Public Health around Australia
along with a number of short stints with other
academic and research groups, mainly in the
Netherlands (University of Leiden and Maastricht
University) and USA. I left Sydney University
in 1994 and moved to become the
Head of a relatively new but rapidly developing
School of Public Health in Queensland in
Australia and in 2006, I move to the School of
Public Health and Preventive Medicine at Monash
University in Melbourne, where I am currently,
Professor and Inaugural Chair of International
Public Health at that university.
Q3.
Do you think that behavioral medicine as
a field is picking up on trends from other related
fields, such as psychology or internal
medicine, or do you think that behavioral
medicine is setting trends which influence
other areas as well (or both)? Can you provide
examples?
A3.
I find this quite a hard question to answer
because I really think the field of behavioral
medicine is so inter-disciplinary that it is very
hard to disentangle the causal chain and links
with so many other fields and disciplines!
However, I do think it is probably the case
that behavioral medicine is more and more influenced
by developments in other underpinning
disciplines and fields. For example, as
we come to understand the role and importance
of social and environmental influences
on health, we now (almost) take it for granted
that behavioral medicine interventions need
to focus more on social and environmental influences
in relation to health outcomes than
was the case even 10 or 15 years ago. I am
also particularly interested in the inter-play
between behavioral medicine and public
health research. I also find epidemiologists
and biostatisticians can be lot of fun to work
with and I really enjoy the multi-disciplinarity
of both behavioral medicine and public
health. Although I spent many years training
and working in psychology, and collaborating
with many psychologists over the years, I often
say that I have never worked in an academic
department of psychology and I don’t
know that I have ever really “missed” that experience.
Indeed, although I still collaborate
with psychologists from many different countries
around the world, I would say that most
of the psychologists I collaborate with are also
based in Schools of Public Health and/or are
part of very multi-disciplinary research teams.
Q4.
You are a long-standing member of ISBM
and you have been part of the editorial board
of the International Journal of Behavioral
Medicine. What were the most significant
milestones in the development of both the
society and the journal over time in your
eyes?
A4.
Before I answer this question, I must say
that it was so very important for me to attend
and to be part of the very first International
Congress of Behavioral Medicine in Uppsala,
Sweden in 1990. I have been to every ICBM
since then and so many of my research and
other collaborations, as well as my personal
and professional relationships, can be
‘mapped’ back to people I have met as a result
of our congresses and other ISBM activities.
For example, it is through my involvement
with ISBM and US SBM that I have met
and then been able to develop long term collaborations
with colleagues in Sweden
(Gunilla Burrell), Finland (Pekka Puska, Antti
Uutela and Pilvikki Absetz), US (eg. Jim Sallis,
Bob Kaplan, Karen Glanz, Ed Fisher, Barr Taylor)
and many others.
From my point of view, I would say that there
are three standout ISBM developments.
Firstly, it has been really great to see the establishment
of so many excellent national/
regional behavioral medicine societies
and many of those are now outside Western
Europe and USA. This includes the development
of relatively new societies in Asia, Australia/
New Zealand and Latin America. The
second really exciting development has been
to see how our International Congress of Behavioral
Medicine has become such a terrific
conference and a wonderful place to meet
long standing colleagues and friends every 2
years in a different part of the world. Thirdly,
it is so wonderful to see how the International
Journal of Behavioral Medicine has gradually
become such an important and influential
global behavioral medicine journal. I strongly
believe that ‘behavioral medicine’ will become
even stronger as a global field when we
can demonstrate even more convincingly the
important contribution of this field to the
health and well-being of people in the less developed
regions of the world.
Q5.
You served as our society’s President from
1998 to 2000, and you were the Program
Committee Chair for the sixth ICBM. I can
imagine that these two positions hold particular
challenges. Can you tell us a little bit about
it?
A5.
I am not sure you really want to know
about ALL the challenges! However, I always
find it an honour to serve in leadership roles
as President of a society and/or as Congress
Program Chair for an international conference.
Of course, there are always significant
challenges with such roles, particularly with
any international or global organization, buton the other hand, such roles work much better
when there is a good, strong team of other
great people to work with and that has always
been the case with ISBM. However, many of
the ISBM leadership group have been involved
with the organization for at least 15-20 years
now, so I would say that a very exciting challenge
for the future of ISBM is to identify who
are going to be the ‘early’ and ‘mid-career’ researchers
and academics who will be the
ISBM leaders for the next 15-20 years!
Q6. Our society is an international one. Still,
different countries and cultures might have
different approaches to the same issue. As an
Australian, do you think that there is a specific
Australian (or Australasian) perspective on
behavioral medicine? If yes, how is it defined?
A6.
Yes, I think this probably is the case, because
there are differences in the ways in
which the underpinning disciplines of behavioral
medicine, such as psychology, are practiced
in different countries. Moreover, health
systems and health services vary between
countries, so this also leads to different approaches
being used to address similar problems.
As I spend more of my working life in
countries like China, India and South Africa, I
now also realise that most researchers, educators
and health practitioners in developed
countries are still not very good at “exchanging”
evidence and experiences between countries,
cultures and settings. For example, I
have seen firsthand and experienced some of
the best ‘real world’ socio-behavioral intervention
programs in countries like South Africa
that are being implemented and ‘scaled
up’ for people at ‘high risk’ of HIV/AIDS and
other big public health challenges. These programs
are often really well adapted and culturally
translated to the local situation and
context. While there is a very rapidly developing
global evidence base for behavioral medicine
now, I believe there is still a strong tendency
for those in developed countries to
think that the ‘best’ and ‘most important’ evidence
only comes from developed countries.
Q7.
You are a professor of public health and
firmly rooted in public health research. What
contributions to public health do you expect
from behavioral medicine? It would be great if
you could respond to this question a) from a
general perspective and b) from a personal
perspective. In the context of the latter, I
would also like to ask you to tell us a little bit
about your role as an international health advisor
for the Olympics in Bejing.
A7.
I have already made some comments
about the very important interplay that exists
between the fields of behavioral medicine and
public health and nowhere is this interplay
more important than in the most rapidly developing
and changing countries in the world
in Africa, Asia and Latin America. In developing
countries that do not have really well developed
research and practice that is specifically
related to behavioral medicine, public
health provides a very good ‘lens’ through
which it is possible to study very important
health challenges – such as the chronic noncommunicable
diseases and their risk factors
– and to research innovative approaches to
prevention and management that are relevantto those countries and their systems. When I
became involved as a public health advisor for
the Beijing Olympic Games soon after the
2000 Olympic Games in Sydney, I had the opportunity
to work with many different health
organizations and universities in China to address
the health issues – for example, communicable
diseases, environmental health,
tobacco control – that had already been identified
as potential threats for the Beijing
Olympic Games in 2008. Through a fortuitous
set of circumstances that arose from an evolving
collaboration between the Beijing Olympic
Games Organizations (BOCOG), the Beijing
Government, the National Health Ministry and
the World Health Organization, the Chinese
decided to use the Beijing Olympic Games to
create a lasting public health legacy for Beijing
and China from the Olympic Games. Indeed,
this turned out to be the case, with rapid improvements
taking place in air quality, tobacco
control and many other health issues in
Beijing over the last 5 years. As it turns out, an
English and Chinese language Monograph will
be published in the next couple of months
which tells this story, how it happened and
what the lessons will be for developing countries
in the future, who aim to use mass
events, such as Olympic Games, World Cup
Football etc, to improve the health and wellbeing
of their people.
Q8.
Finally, what do you see in the future of
behavioral medicine? If a young person wants
to do something new and exciting, what
would it be?
A8. Globally, countries comprising 80% of the
world’s population, cannot afford the very expensive,
technology-dependent and inefficient
health systems that have been created
by developed countries over the last 50 years.
For these countries in the most rapidly developing
regions of the world, if they are going to
be able to improve the health and well-being
of the majority of their people, behavioral
medicine is absolutely critical and they do not
really have a choice to ignore the contribution
of behavioral, psychosocial, environmental
and other factors on health outcomes and
how to improve these. So, I would say that the
future of behavioral medicine is definitely not
in doubt! Consequently, for any young person
who has trained in a discipline or field relevant
to health, I would say that the career
prospects in behavioral medicine and related
fields look pretty good to me!
For my final words of advice, I would say three
things:
- Be prepared to follow non-traditional
paths to get to where you want to go because
this will often end up being (even)
more interesting than the traditional
path you may have followed to get
there.
- Make sure you choose a couple of really
good mentors and make sure at least
one of them is someone who has not developed
their career in a very traditional
way. It often takes some courage and
risk-taking to do things differently from
those around you!
- If at all possible, it’s really important to
experience what life and work are like in
other countries or cultures. This will also
help you question many of your own assumptions
and ways of doing things.
Q8. I don’t want to be the person to decide
who is important in behavioral medicine and
who is not. So, I let you decide. Who should
be the next person I am going to interview?
There are three prerequisites: the person
should be a woman, should not stem from the
same country as you do, and should be a
member of ISBM.
A8. I would recommend that you interview
Graciela Rodriguez from Mexico. She is a very
interesting person and she has been one of
the most important figures in the development
of the field of behavioral medicine in
Mexico and the rest of Latin America. She has
also been very influential ‘behind the scenes’
of ISBM in all sorts of interesting ways!
Thanks so much for your time, I really appreciate
it!
|
 |
|
Early Career Network
Hi everyone! It’s six months away from the
next International Congress of Behavioral
Medicine. We are currently busy organizing a
few exciting social and conference activities
for our young researchers. This issue will give
you an overview of all these happenings so
that you can start planning your travels.
ECN Workshop
We are grateful and honored to have finalized
speakers for our conference workshop. Led by
Ed Fisher from the United States, and cofacilitated
Brian Oldenburg (Australia), Renee
Boothroyd (US) and ourselves, the workshop
entitled “Cross Cultural Research in Health
Promotion and Chronic Disease Management”
aims at improving skills to conducting health
promotion and disease management research
in international settings. The workshop will
highlight issues pertaining to the selection of
research objectives and outcome indicators,
identification of reliable measures of outcomes,
and development of interventions that
combine strategies based in research evidence
and provide for tailoring to local
strengths and needs. The workshop will provide
an interactive forum for addressing these
issues.
Social night out
Feedback from early career members at the
previous ICBM conference recommended that
a more informal meeting take place where
members could have the chance to discuss
their work with others. Therefore an early career
dinner is proposed for the Thursday night
of the conference at a time and venue to be
confirmed. Assistance from local organizers
have identified a few places of interest but
anyone from the Washington DC area or who
knows it well is more than welcome to contribute
suggestions.
ECN Accomodation
Another way for early career researchers to
get to know each other is to meet through
their accommodation whilst at the conference
in Washington DC. To be in the best interests
of many early career members a place was
identified that was economically viable yet
convenient to the conference venue. Details
of this accommodation will be posted on the
ICBM Washington website.
If there are any questions about any of these
activities or the ECN please don’t hesitate to
make contact.
Carina Chan: carina.chan@med.monash.edu.my
Monash University (Sunway Campus), Malaysia
Marisa Finn: m.finn@auckland.ac.nz
The University of Auckland, New Zealand
| |
ICBM 2010 Theme and Featured Presenters
The theme of the 11th ICBM is “Translational Behavioral Research: A Global Challenge”, which will
encourage global networking among all who contribute to the science and practice of behavioral
medicine. ICBM 2010 will include keynote addresses, master lectures and panels, symposia, roundtable
discussions, oral and poster presentations, meetings of special interest groups, workshops,
scientific and trade exhibitions and ample opportunity to network with colleagues. Our speakers
are prominent individuals from five continents who will address basic science, community applications
and policy issues of behavioral medicine.
Keynote Addresses
 |
Kelly D. Brownell, PhD
Harnessing Science for Social and Policy Change: The Diet and Obesity Example
Professor of Psychology, Epidemiology and Public Health
Director, Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity Yale University (United States) |
 |
Jaakko Kaprio, MD, PhD
Contribution of Genomics to Behavioral Medicine
Professor of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of
Helsinki, National Institute for Health and Welfare (Finland) |
 |
Olive Shisana, BA(SS), MA, ScD
Behavioral Research in Informing HIV Prevention Practices
Executive Director, South African National Research Program
CEO of the South African Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC)
(South Africa) |
Masters Lecturer
 |
Karen D. Davis, PhD
Development of New Diagnostic Tools and Treatments for Brain Disorders
Division of Brain, Imaging and Behaviour, Toronto Western Research Institute,
University Health Network; Department of Surgery and Institute of
Medical Science, University of Toronto (Canada) |
 |
Theresa M. Marteau, BSc, MSc, PhD
Communicating Genetic Risks: Three Fallacies and a Challenge
Professor, Health Psychology Section, King's College London
(United Kingdom) |
 |
Adolfo Martínez-Palomo MD, DSc
Bioethics and Behavioral Research
Coordinator of the Science Council for the Presidency
Emeritus Professor of Experimental Pathology, Center for Research and Advanced
Studies (Mexico) |
 |
Robert Croyle, PhD
Cognitive, Motivational and Social Processes Underlying Threat Appraisal
and Coping
Director, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer
Institute (United States) |
Master Panels*
 |
Athula Sumathipala, MBBS, DFM, MD, MRCPsych, CCST, PhD
Medically Unexplained Symptoms
Honorary Director, Institute for Research and Development in Sri Lanka;
Honorary Research Fellow, Section of Epidemiology Institute of Psychiatry,
Kings College, University of London (Sri Lanka) |
 |
Lin Li, BA, MPh, PhD
Predictors of Quitting Behaviors among Adult Smokers in China Compared to
two Southeast Asian Countries and four Western Countries
Research Scientist, VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, Cancer Council
Victoria in Australia (Australia/China) |
 |
Mira Aghi, MA, PhD
Issues and Dynamics of Tobacco Research for Behavior and Policy
Behavioral Scientist, Communication Expert, Advocacy Forum for Tobacco
Control (AFTC); UNICEF; Global Youth Tobacco Survey; International Network
of Women against Tobacco (INWAT); Society for Research on Nicotine
and Tobacco (SRNT); Cancer Patients AID Association (India) |
 |
Fred Wabwire-Mangen, MBChB, MPH, PhD
The Changing Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS in Africa
Associate Professor, Makerere University School of Public Health (MUSPH)
(Uganda) |
*A generous grant from the Rockefeller Foundation
to our host society, the Society of Behavioral
Medicine, will be used to support the
participation of the master panelists from developing
regions of the world. Their contribution
will allow us to expand our views of the
translation of behavior science to diverse settings.
Abstract Submission and Scoring Procedures
We are pleased to announce that we received
more than 650 abstract submissions by the 15
January deadline! Fifty-two track chairs and
co-chairs representing twenty-one countries
have blindly scored all abstract submissions in
the past several weeks. Each abstract was
judged in several categories, including:
- Scientific Significance
- Strength of Methodology/Design
- Creativity/Originality/Innovation
- Clarity of writing
- Consideration of Meeting Theme
At the end of the scoring period, the results
were tabulated and presented to the Scientific
Program Committee. The Committee then
made the final selections based on the chairs’
scores and recommendations, and all sessions
were scheduled during a three day in-person
meeting.
If you did not have an opportunity to submit
an abstract by the January deadline, Rapid
Communications Poster Submission will open
on Monday, 15 March and close on Saturday,
1 May 2010.
Congress Registration
All abstract presenters, as well as attendees,
must formally register for the Congress and
pay the required registration fee. Please note
that registration for the congress will be a requirement
for abstracts being published in the
special supplement issue of the International
Journal of Behavioral Medicine.
Register online at https://www.sbm.org/
isbm/registration_form.asp by 15 June 2010
to take advantage of the Early Registration
pricing, which offers a substantial discount to
both member and non member attendees.
Lodging Information
The Grand Hyatt Washington D.C. is the headquarter
hotel for ICBM 2010. Be sure to make
your reservations by 6 July 2010, to take advantage
of the low Congress rates. Please visit
https://resweb.passkey.com/Resweb.do?mod
e=welcome_ei_new&eventID=1482447 to
book your room.
Local Activities
From the lobby of the downtown Grand Hyatt,
hop on the Metro, and you'll discover that all
the attractions in Washington DC are within
easy reach. Here are just a few samples of local
activities:
Corcoran Gallery of Art
500 17th Street NW
Washington DC
202-639-1700
www.corcoran.org
National Gallery of Art
6th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington DC
202-7373-4215
www.nga.gov
Smithsonian
Museums of The Smithsonian are free and include:
- African Art Museum
- Air and Space Museum
- American Art Museum and the Renwick
Gallery
- National Museum of the American Indian
- Anacostia Community Museum
- Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum
- Freer and Sackler Galleries (Asian art)
- Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden
- National Zoo
- Natural History Museum
- Portrait Gallery
- Postal Museum
- Smithsonian Institution Building, the Castle
- African American History and Culture Museum
Contact details
For information on the Congress and details of
rapid communications abstract submission,
please visit the Congress website at
www.icbm2010.org.
Please direct any inquires about the ICBM
program to Amy Genc Moritz, ICBM 2010 Secretariat,
at amoritz@icbm2010.org
We look forward to welcoming everyone to
the 11th International Congress of Behavioral
Medicine in Washington, D.C. in August 2010!


|
Awardees
Dr Wong Li Ping
 |
Dr Wong Li Ping, received
her Ph.D. in medical
science (Epidemiology)
from the University of
Malaya in 2004. Upon
graduation, she took a
position as a lecturer at
the Medical and Research
Development Unit
(MERDU), Faculty of
Medicine, University of
Malaya, Malaysia. She
takes part in the Faculty's
research methodology and biostatistical
teaching both at the undergraduate and graduate
levels, as well as biostatistical consultancy
services within and outside the Faculty.
She expressed a heart felt gratitude to ISBM
for granting her the AWARD that enabled her
to present her research findings at the ICBM,
Tokyo, 2008. At the conference, she received
constructive feedback that addresses areas in
need of improvement. Additionally she also
gained insights into new research methodologies
and research issues.
|
She believes that
ICBM is a primary international event that
provides an opportunity for academicians and
researchers in the field of behavioral medicine
throughout the world to gather, exchange
ideas, and present their research findings. She
viewed the AWARD serves to increase motivation
among young researchers contributing to
research and development in behavioral medicine.
She also hopes ISBM would continuously
give this AWARD to recognize and inspire
young researchers at the beginning of their
profession. She is looking forward to attending
and presenting her latest research findings
at the forthcoming ICBM, Washington, 2010.
Recognizing the importance
of behavioral
component in medicine,
Dr Wong wishes to continue
working for the
advancement in the area
of behavioral health in
her organization by engagingly
actively in research
and teaching. Dr.
Wong’s research has
centered almost exclusively
on social and behavioral medicine. Her
current research activity focuses on role of
race, culture, and ethnicity on health. She has
diverse research interests, all in the field of
social and behavioral medicine, include:
-
Research on risk behaviors (HIV/AIDS
Survelliance; HIV/AIDS-related discrimination
and stigmatization; youth risk behavior
surveillance)
-
Research on preventive behaviors (Cervical
cancer screening; HPV vaccination;
2009 influenza H1N1 vaccine)
-
Community responses (Behavioral responses
to emerging infectious diseases,
2009 influenza H1N1 and influenza vaccination;
HPV vaccines; deceased organ
and tissue donation; knowledge and attitudes
towards thalassemia)
-
Sexual reproductive health research
(dysmenorrheal and PMS of young female;
male sexual dysfunction; hysterectomy
and detrimental effect onwomen’s sense of psychosocial wellbeing
and sexual functioning; impact of
aging on sexual function in women)
Currently a Senior Lecturer, Dr. Wong has authored
and co-authored over 30 papers published
in local and international peer-reviewed
journals and has been awarded 8 grants as
Principal Investigator and 11 grants as Coinvestigator.
She has also served as a reviewer
for peer-reviewed journals including AIDS
Care, Journal of International AIDS Society, International
Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics,
Journal of Men's Health, Singapore Medical
Journal, and Malaysian Family Physician.
She has presented over 40 papers at local, national,
and international conferences.
Roger Persson
 |
In 2005, when I
started working
as a senior researcher
at the
National Research
Centre
for the Working
Environment
(NRCWE) in Copenhagen,
it was in continuation of having
worked at the Departments of Occupational
and Environmental Medicine in Malmö and
Lund in Sweden. My qualifications for these
positions derived from my basic training as a
research psychologist and from my degree in
political science.
Currently much of my time is directed towards
the task of being project leader in an evaluation
project concerning health promotion in
the Danish police. My research interests and
activities remain diverse however, and include
bullying, ergonomics, noise, personality and
psychophysiology research. |
These diverse topics
reflect, in part, the applied and changing
nature of occupational health research as well
as the variety of my own and my colleagues’
interests. Apart from collecting first hand experience
by listening to patients or conducting
workplace visits, good research ideas are often
born during informal talks with colleagues
during the coffee break. Sometimes these
ideas are realised, at other times they are discarded
or put in storage for later use.
However, to understand today’s pattern of
health and illness in occupational settings it is,
in many cases, important to understand the
individual’s total life situation and to integrate
psychosocial, behavioural and biomedical
knowledge. For this reason, developing the
supplementary qualities of physiological, psychological
and behavioural research methods
is high on my own, and many of my colleague’s,
research agendas, as is a focus on
the interaction between society, work organization
and the individual worker. In practice
this complexity is also often reflected by
cross-disciplinary research and international
collaboration.
Being a beneficiary of the Scientific Distinction
Award is, of course, a great honour for me.
The reward is also recognition for the efforts
put in by my former and current research colleagues
who, over the years, have invested
their interest and skills to the benefit of my
work. In contrast to teaching, which gives you
immediate feed-back, research is often solitary
work and the response time from outsidethe research group can often be counted in
months or years. This was, in fact, one reason
that made me apply for the Scientific Distinction
Award. It gave me an opportunity to test
whether my combined research achievements
thus far were actually valued outside my immediate
network of colleagues. Another, albeit
related, reason for my application was to
improve my future chances for receiving funding
in a seemingly more unforeseeable and
competitive research landscape. My idea here
was simply that obtaining recognition that
goes beyond the national level and the adjacent
research community would be a better
indicator of quality and hopefully give me a
competitive advantage in future fights for
grants. Of course, ultimately, one must not
forget that scientific endeavours are a high
risk game. Today’s winner could easily be tomorrow’s
loser, as knowledge become obsolete
and provisional truths are replaced with
new provisional truths. So while I’m happy for
the recognition, I’m also aware that much of
my work is ahead of me and that research careers
may, for various reasons, end abruptly.
Before my own career comes to a halt, however,
I hope to have made some scientifically
sound and robust contributions that will help
advance behavioural medicine as a means for
enhancing occupational health research and
thereby help reduce occupational disease and
improve workers well-being.
Contact details: Roger Persson, Lersø Parkallé
105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Telephone: +45 39 16 54 78
Fax: +45 3916 5201
E-mail: rpe@nrcwe.dk.
News from Societies
Event
Date
Place |
24th Annual Conference of The European Health Psychology Society
1st – 4th September 2010
Cluj-Napoca, Romania |
| |
Dear Colleagues,
The European Health Psychology Society invites you to participate in the 24th Annual Conference to be held in Cluj-Napoca,
Romania, 1-4 September 2010. The conference provides the opportunity to present research findings and to share working
experience with colleagues from countries all around the world, to strengthen current networks and build new ones. Your
participation and scientific contribution can broaden and deepen our understanding of global health in light of the conference
theme, Health in Context. Cluj, the treasure city of Transylvania, which from the Middle Ages onward has been a multicultural
city characterized by diversity and intellectual effervescence, offers the perfect setting for the 2010 Annual Conference
of the European Health Psychology Society.
We look forward to seeing you in Cluj,
Adriana Baban, Conference President
Scientific Programme
The 24th Conference of The European Health Psychology features a variety of formats including: Keynote lectures, Symposia,
Oral and Poster sessions; Roundtables/Panel discussion; Pre-conference workshops; Synergy and Create workshops.
Keynote Speakers
Prof. Michelle Fine (City University of New York, New York, USA)
Prof. Michael Murray (Keele University, Keele, UK)
Prof. Mircea Miclea (Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
Prof. Suzanne Segerstrom (University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA)
Important Dates
February 15th 2010 – Deadline for abstract submissions
April 15th 2010 – Abstract acceptance notification
May 15th 2010 – Deadline for early registration and hotel accommodation
June 15th 2010 – Deadline for Synergy and Create application/registration
Website: http://www.ehps-cluj2010.psychology.ro/
Email: contact_ehps@psychology.ro
Local organizers
Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca & Romanian Association of Health Psychology
|
News
Who
|
Behavioral medicine meets physiotherapy: a new training program
Anne Söderlund, professor of physical therapy, Mälardalen University, School of Health and Welfare,
Division of Physical Therapy.
|
| |
History and present
Physiotherapy training started in autumn 2004. A teacher at Mälardalen University who thought that we should have a
physical therapist trained in Mälardalen contacted Eva Denison in Uppsala. The idea of a profiled physiotherapy program
came from another person, Eva Denison, PhD, Physical therapist, who had in their thesis in 1999 integrated a behavioral
medicine approach with physiotherapy studies, and who had seen the benefits of this combination. Since then, this kind of
integrated research efforts has expanded a lot, particularly in the area of pain, which is one of the most important fields for a
physiotherapist.
The training program is an evidence-based physiotherapy program. We are the only physical therapist program in Sweden
with this profile and we are also convinced that we are the only program in the world which has incorporated behavioral
medicine in a physical therapist program. Students all the way from semester 1 to semester 6th are learning functional behavior
analysis and behavior change principles, which are the key elements of the program.
Challenges in Education
To find mentors for students with this profile was not an easy thing. There were only very few courses in behavioral medicine.
This led to an operation which has resulted in about 300 clinical physiotherapists being trained by us in behavioral
medicine today. The training encompasses a 7.5 hp single course in behavioral medicine, but also by 2-day short courses and
alternative training events-days to ensure the quality of mentoring of our students. We held several public seminars to present
the education profile. These have been very well attended and later in the autumn of 2009, we managed to convince a
number of politicians for our cause and received positive approvals by officials from the surrounding community.
Future
I have a vision of the future, including other health care training to focus more on teaching the importance of a person's beliefs,
expectations, and systematic work on behavioral change. We also would have very different effects on teamwork at all
levels of care. But to get there, inter-professional collaboration in research is needed.
|
News
Who
|
Two new international research networks established
Arja R Aro, Chair, ISBM ICSC, araro@health.sdu.dk
|
| |
Two exiting research and network initiatives have been established! One is the EIRA network (EIRA=Evidence In Research
and Action, which provides an international platform for those interested in bridging the gap between research evidence,
practice and policy in health promotion The other one is the Peers for Progress global program to promote peer support in
health care and health promotion. These networks plan to organize a session together at the ICBM in Washington in August
2010.
You can find more information about these initiatives, their potential for research collaboration, and about the previously
established network on Subjective and Unexplained Health Complaints at the ISBM International Collaborative Studies
Committee (ICSC) website http://www.isbm.info/ICSC/best_projects.html. Websites for the new networks are:
www.sdu.dk/eira and www.peersforprogress.org |
|
|
|